Hi Davidlohr,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:03:57 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 23:51 +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi Davidlohr,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> > Hi Namhyung,
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
Hi Davidlohr,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:03:57 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 23:51 +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Davidlohr,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso davidl...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 23:51 +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Davidlohr,
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Hi Namhyung,
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> By adding a top-level option, I think it should be applied to all
> >>
Hi Davidlohr,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> By adding a top-level option, I think it should be applied to all
>> benchmaks - but I guess it only supports sched messaging and futex,
>> right?
>
Hi Namhyung,
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Davidlohr,
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:14:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and
> > as a result does not really help users gain a general idea
> > of how the workload
Hi Davidlohr,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:14:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and
> as a result does not really help users gain a general idea
> of how the workload performs. So the user must either manually
> do multiple runs or just use single
Hi Davidlohr,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:14:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and
as a result does not really help users gain a general idea
of how the workload performs. So the user must either manually
do multiple runs or just use single bogus
Hi Namhyung,
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Davidlohr,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:14:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and
as a result does not really help users gain a general idea
of how the workload performs.
Hi Davidlohr,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso davidl...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
By adding a top-level option, I think it should be applied to all
benchmaks - but I guess it only supports sched messaging and futex,
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 23:51 +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Davidlohr,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso davidl...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
By adding a top-level option, I think it should be applied to all
There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and
as a result does not really help users gain a general idea
of how the workload performs. So the user must either manually
do multiple runs or just use single bogus results.
This option will enable users to specify the amount of runs
There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and
as a result does not really help users gain a general idea
of how the workload performs. So the user must either manually
do multiple runs or just use single bogus results.
This option will enable users to specify the amount of runs
12 matches
Mail list logo
