On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 08:21:51AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10 April 2013 07:42, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Thanks, I understand.
> >
> > I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.
>
> It is already Acked by him and applied by Rafael.
:)
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 10 April 2013 07:42, Simon Horman wrote:
> Thanks, I understand.
>
> I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.
It is already Acked by him and applied by Rafael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:42:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > I am missing the cover
On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
>
> Why?
>
> I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
Hi Simon,
The idea was to keep
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Why?
I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
>
> Cc: Paul Mundt
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Why?
I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
Cc: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by:
On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Why?
I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
Hi Simon,
The idea
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:42:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Why?
I am missing the
On 10 April 2013 07:42, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
Thanks, I understand.
I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.
It is already Acked by him and applied by Rafael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 08:21:51AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 10 April 2013 07:42, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
Thanks, I understand.
I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.
It is already Acked by him and applied by Rafael.
:)
--
To unsubscribe
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Paul Mundt
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
Acked-by: Paul Mundt
---
arch/sh/Kconfig| 18 --
arch/sh/kernel/Makefile
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
---
arch/sh/Kconfig| 18
12 matches
Mail list logo
