On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:53:40AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> This would be better titled as:
>
> compiler: don't return a value from WRITE_ONCE()
No strong opinion here: I'll adopt your suggestion in v2 if there are
no objections. And similarly for the rcu_assign_pointer() patch.
>
>
This would be better titled as:
compiler: don't return a value from WRITE_ONCE()
... since we do want the WRITE_ONCE() itself to be evaluated.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:35:36PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Now that there's no single use of the value of WRITE_ONCE(), change
> the
Now that there's no single use of the value of WRITE_ONCE(), change
the implementation to eliminate it.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri
Cc: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Jorgen Hansen
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Will Deacon
Cc: Mark Rutland
Cc: "Paul E.
3 matches
Mail list logo
