On 7/20/07, Paul Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Denis Cheng wrote:
> this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
> so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
> this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
>
> in the function nbd_read_stat
Denis Cheng wrote:
this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
in the function nbd_read_stat where nbd_find_request is only once called,
the parameter served
this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
in the function nbd_read_stat where nbd_find_request is only once called,
the parameter served should be transformed
this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
in the function nbd_read_stat where nbd_find_request is only once called,
the parameter served should be transformed
Denis Cheng wrote:
this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
in the function nbd_read_stat where nbd_find_request is only once called,
the parameter served
On 7/20/07, Paul Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Denis Cheng wrote:
this memcpy looks so strange, in fact it's merely a pointer dereference,
so I change the parameter's type to refer it more directly,
this could make the memcpy not needed anymore.
in the function nbd_read_stat where
6 matches
Mail list logo
