To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the required pre-alloc. But
consistency is valuable.
The read
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the required pre-alloc. But
consistency is valuable.
The read
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:57:06AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
> writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
> This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
> on first read, so user-space can trigger
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:57:06AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the required pre-alloc. But
consistency is valuable.
The read
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the required pre-alloc. But
consistency is valuable.
The read
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:33:34PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
> writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
> This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
> on first read, so user-space can trigger
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:33:34PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the required pre-alloc. But
consistency is valuable.
The read
To match the previous patch which used the pre-alloc buffer for
writes, this patch causes reads to use the same buffer.
This is not strictly necessary as the current seq_read() will allocate
on first read, so user-space can trigger the required pre-alloc. But
consistency is valuable.
The read
10 matches
Mail list logo