On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 06:28:48PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:34:01PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
> > path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
> > the fact that
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:34:01PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
> path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
> the fact that mounts done with subvolid= or the default subvolume don't
> have a
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:06:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
> From: Omar Sandoval
> To: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba
> ,
> Date: 2015年04月08日 13:34
&g
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:34:01PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
the fact that mounts done with subvolid= or the default subvolume don't
have a dentry
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:06:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
From: Omar Sandoval osan...@osandov.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com, David Sterba
dste...@suse.cz
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 06:28:48PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:34:01PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
the fact that mounts
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
From: Omar Sandoval
To: Qu Wenruo
Date: 2015年04月08日 15:17
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:06:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:06:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
> From: Omar Sandoval
> To: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba
> ,
> Date: 2015年04月08日 13:34
&
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
From: Omar Sandoval
To: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba
,
Date: 2015年04月08日 13:34
Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
path than mounting
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
From: Omar Sandoval osan...@osandov.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com, David Sterba
dste...@suse.cz, linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2015年04月08日 13:34
Currently
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:06:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
From: Omar Sandoval osan...@osandov.com
To: Chris Mason c...@fb.com, Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com, David Sterba
dste...@suse.cz
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting
From: Omar Sandoval osan...@osandov.com
To: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: 2015年04月08日 15:17
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:06:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Original
Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
the fact that mounts done with subvolid= or the default subvolume don't
have a dentry that's connected to the dentry tree like in the subvol=
case. To
Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
the fact that mounts done with subvolid= or the default subvolume don't
have a dentry that's connected to the dentry tree like in the subvol=
case. To
14 matches
Mail list logo
