On Friday 09 March 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
> had enough fun stuff to debug already. Thus, just queued the following
> for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
>
> The nasty request_resource hack is finally gone.
>
> In
On Friday, March 9, 2007 8:01 am Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
> had enough fun stuff to debug already. Thus, just queued the
> following for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
>
> The nasty request_resource hack is finally gone.
>
>
Alan Cox wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and you can remove even more code as pci_request_resources() will now
just do the right thing for all cases.
pci_request_regions() you mean?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and you can remove even more code as pci_request_resources() will now
just do the right thing for all cases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Jeff Garzik wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index 066689c..0a19466 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -779,40 +779,16 @@ int ata_pci_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev, struct
ata_port_info **port_info,
/*
Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
had enough fun stuff to debug already. Thus, just queued the following
for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
The nasty request_resource hack is finally gone.
In practical terms, this usually means that some combined mode
Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
had enough fun stuff to debug already. Thus, just queued the following
for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
The nasty request_resource hack is finally gone.
In practical terms, this usually means that some combined mode
Jeff Garzik wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index 066689c..0a19466 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -779,40 +779,16 @@ int ata_pci_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev, struct
ata_port_info **port_info,
/*
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and you can remove even more code as pci_request_resources() will now
just do the right thing for all cases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
Alan Cox wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and you can remove even more code as pci_request_resources() will now
just do the right thing for all cases.
pci_request_regions() you mean?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Friday, March 9, 2007 8:01 am Jeff Garzik wrote:
Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
had enough fun stuff to debug already. Thus, just queued the
following for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
The nasty request_resource hack is finally gone.
In
On Friday 09 March 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Discussed for 2.6.21, but pushed back because the current SATA code
had enough fun stuff to debug already. Thus, just queued the following
for 2.6.22 in libata-dev.git#upstream.
The nasty request_resource hack is finally gone.
In
12 matches
Mail list logo