On 06/09/2016 08:29 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:00PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> Currently for each device with a unique register map we have a named
>> array that we then merge into a multidimensional array. Skip this
>> middle step and apply the
On 06/09/2016 08:29 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:00PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> Currently for each device with a unique register map we have a named
>> array that we then merge into a multidimensional array. Skip this
>> middle step and apply the
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:00PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Currently for each device with a unique register map we have a named
> array that we then merge into a multidimensional array. Skip this
> middle step and apply the register arrays directly to the multi-array.
I applied the
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:00PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Currently for each device with a unique register map we have a named
> array that we then merge into a multidimensional array. Skip this
> middle step and apply the register arrays directly to the multi-array.
I applied the
Currently for each device with a unique register map we have a named
array that we then merge into a multidimensional array. Skip this
middle step and apply the register arrays directly to the multi-array.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
---
drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c | 281
Currently for each device with a unique register map we have a named
array that we then merge into a multidimensional array. Skip this
middle step and apply the register arrays directly to the multi-array.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
---
drivers/power/bq27xxx_battery.c | 281
6 matches
Mail list logo