BTW.,
if someone still likes my trivial approach and thinks the patches might
be usable because they contain just a few silly changes which might be
easily rebased onto future kernel versions, I suggest to get rid of the
new syscall and just use something like
#define AT_WIPE
Am 03.02.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
I'm already spending a lot of time trying to convince the developers here,
that this a feature most people expect from any filesystem. And I've written
these patches, for which now, even after I've
Am 03.02.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
I'll give up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:50:53 +0100
> From: Alexander Holler
> To: Lukáš Czerner
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s() for secure
>
Am 03.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 03.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Maybe I should request removal of shred from Fedora/RH instead.
According to you it's one of the most misleading and useless tools. So
why still confuse people with it and still ship it?
At
Am 03.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Maybe I should request removal of shred from Fedora/RH instead.
According to you it's one of the most misleading and useless tools. So
why still confuse people with it and still ship it?
At least it should be documented that it doesn't delete
Am 03.02.2015 um 14:50 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:05:11 +0100
From: Alexander Holler
To: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Holler
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:05:11 +0100
> From: Alexander Holler
> To: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Holler
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s() for secure deletion
>
3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s() for secure deletion
of files
Hi,
I am missing a description, where you'd describe what is this all
about, why and how.
Maybe you've missed the introduction, patch 0/5.
Sorry, but I'm not sponsored and the time I can spend is limited.
Therefor
Am 03.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Maybe I should request removal of shred from Fedora/RH instead.
According to you it's one of the most misleading and useless tools. So
why still confuse people with it and still ship it?
At least it should be documented that it doesn't delete
Am 03.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 03.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Maybe I should request removal of shred from Fedora/RH instead.
According to you it's one of the most misleading and useless tools. So
why still confuse people with it and still ship it?
At
Am 03.02.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
I'll give up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Am 03.02.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
I'm already spending a lot of time trying to convince the developers here,
that this a feature most people expect from any filesystem. And I've written
these patches, for which now, even after I've
Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s() for secure
deletion
of files
Hi,
I am missing a description, where you'd describe what is this all
about, why and how.
Maybe you've missed the introduction, patch 0/5.
Sorry, but I'm
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:05:11 +0100
From: Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
To: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] WIP: fs: ext4: support unlinkat_s
BTW.,
if someone still likes my trivial approach and thinks the patches might
be usable because they contain just a few silly changes which might be
easily rebased onto future kernel versions, I suggest to get rid of the
new syscall and just use something like
#define AT_WIPE
Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h| 2 ++
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 25 +++--
fs/ext4/super.c | 12
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index c55a1fa..e66507c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h| 2 ++
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 25 +++--
fs/ext4/super.c | 12
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index c55a1fa..e66507c 100644
18 matches
Mail list logo
