On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Balbir.
>
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:56:34AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> [off-topic] Has the unified hierarchy been agreed upon? I did not
>> follow that thread
>
> I consider it agreed upon enough. There of course are objections but
Hello, Balbir.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:56:34AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> [off-topic] Has the unified hierarchy been agreed upon? I did not
> follow that thread
I consider it agreed upon enough. There of course are objections but
I feel fairly comfortable with the amount of existing
Hello, Balbir.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:56:34AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
[off-topic] Has the unified hierarchy been agreed upon? I did not
follow that thread
I consider it agreed upon enough. There of course are objections but
I feel fairly comfortable with the amount of existing
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello, Balbir.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:56:34AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
[off-topic] Has the unified hierarchy been agreed upon? I did not
follow that thread
I consider it agreed upon enough. There of course are
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> cgroup_event is way over-designed and tries to build a generic
> flexible event mechanism into cgroup - fully customizable event
> specification for each user of the interface. This is utterly
> unnecessary and overboard especially in the light
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
cgroup_event is way over-designed and tries to build a generic
flexible event mechanism into cgroup - fully customizable event
specification for each user of the interface. This is utterly
unnecessary and overboard especially in
于 2013/8/5 0:07, Tejun Heo 写道:
> cgroup_event is way over-designed and tries to build a generic
> flexible event mechanism into cgroup - fully customizable event
> specification for each user of the interface. This is utterly
> unnecessary and overboard especially in the light of the planned
>
cgroup_event is way over-designed and tries to build a generic
flexible event mechanism into cgroup - fully customizable event
specification for each user of the interface. This is utterly
unnecessary and overboard especially in the light of the planned
unified hierarchy as there's gonna be
cgroup_event is way over-designed and tries to build a generic
flexible event mechanism into cgroup - fully customizable event
specification for each user of the interface. This is utterly
unnecessary and overboard especially in the light of the planned
unified hierarchy as there's gonna be
于 2013/8/5 0:07, Tejun Heo 写道:
cgroup_event is way over-designed and tries to build a generic
flexible event mechanism into cgroup - fully customizable event
specification for each user of the interface. This is utterly
unnecessary and overboard especially in the light of the planned
unified
10 matches
Mail list logo
