Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 13 November 2017 at 15:40, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> On 6 November 2017 at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> [...] Again, I am not the one who is

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 13 November 2017 at 15:40, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> On 6 November 2017 at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> [...] Again, I am not the one who is ranting here. You hit a nerve by

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 06.11.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 6 November 2017 at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > [...] >>> >>> Again, I am not the one who is ranting here. You hit a nerve by >>> accusing me of 'rebelling against linux.git'

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 06.11.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 6 November 2017 at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > [...] >>> >>> Again, I am not the one who is ranting here. You hit a nerve by >>> accusing me of 'rebelling against linux.git' while this is

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 6 November 2017 at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: [...] >> >> Again, I am not the one who is ranting here. You hit a nerve by >> accusing me of 'rebelling against linux.git' while this is quite the >> opposite of what I am doing.

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 6 November 2017 at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: [...] >> >> Again, I am not the one who is ranting here. You hit a nerve by >> accusing me of 'rebelling against linux.git' while this is quite the >> opposite of what I am doing. > > Actually you

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

> On 6 Nov 2017, at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >>> On 4 November 2017 at 20:06, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

> On 6 Nov 2017, at 06:58, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >>> On 4 November 2017 at 20:06, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 04.11.2017 um

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 20:06, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >>> On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 05.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 20:06, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >>> On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 13:44,

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 4 November 2017 at 20:06, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 4 November 2017 at 20:06, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >>> On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: Hi everyone, The non-building clk driver

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 04.11.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >>> On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: Hi everyone, The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset >>>

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 4 November 2017 at 15:30, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: >> On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset >>> seems stuck on matters of naming and

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset >> seems stuck on matters of naming and maintenance... >> >> Am 30.06.2017 um 01:18

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Am 04.11.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel: > On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset >> seems stuck on matters of naming and maintenance... >> >> Am 30.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Masahiro

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset > seems stuck on matters of naming and maintenance... > > Am 30.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: >> Hi Andreas, >> >>

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On 4 November 2017 at 13:44, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset > seems stuck on matters of naming and maintenance... > > Am 30.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> 2017-06-29 21:53 GMT+09:00

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Hi everyone, The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset seems stuck on matters of naming and maintenance... Am 30.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > Hi Andreas, > > 2017-06-29 21:53 GMT+09:00 Andreas Färber : >> Hi Masahiro-san, >> >> Am

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Hi everyone, The non-building clk driver has been removed for 4.14, but this patchset seems stuck on matters of naming and maintenance... Am 30.06.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > Hi Andreas, > > 2017-06-29 21:53 GMT+09:00 Andreas Färber : >> Hi Masahiro-san, >> >> Am 29.06.2017 um

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Hi Andreas, 2017-06-29 21:53 GMT+09:00 Andreas Färber : > Hi Masahiro-san, > > Am 29.06.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: >> 2017-06-29 1:46 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring : >>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: For consistency

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Hi Andreas, 2017-06-29 21:53 GMT+09:00 Andreas Färber : > Hi Masahiro-san, > > Am 29.06.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: >> 2017-06-29 1:46 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring : >>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Hi Masahiro-san, Am 29.06.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > 2017-06-29 1:46 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring : >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but >>> socionext.txt. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

Hi Masahiro-san, Am 29.06.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > 2017-06-29 1:46 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring : >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but >>> socionext.txt. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

2017-06-29 1:46 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring : > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but >> socionext.txt. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber >> --- >>

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

2017-06-29 1:46 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring : > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but >> socionext.txt. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext.txt |

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but > socionext.txt. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext.txt | 17 + > 1

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but > socionext.txt. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext.txt | 17 + > 1 file changed, 17

[PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but socionext.txt. Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext.txt | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Document Socionext MB86S71 and Fujitsu F-Cue

For consistency with existing SoC bindings, use "fujitsu,mb86s71" but socionext.txt. Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext.txt | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644