On 21/01/15 13:48, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 21/01/15 13:06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:47:37 +
>> Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
With this patchset, is it possible to call sched_clock() from within NMI
context? I ask because the generic sched_clock() code is
On 21/01/15 13:48, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 21/01/15 13:06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:47:37 +
Daniel Thompson daniel.thomp...@linaro.org wrote:
With this patchset, is it possible to call sched_clock() from within NMI
context? I ask because the generic sched_clock()
On 21/01/15 13:06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:47:37 +
> Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
>
>>> With this patchset, is it possible to call sched_clock() from within NMI
>>> context? I ask because the generic sched_clock() code is not NMI safe
>
> That's not good. Better not run
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:47:37 +
Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > With this patchset, is it possible to call sched_clock() from within NMI
> > context? I ask because the generic sched_clock() code is not NMI safe
That's not good. Better not run function tracing, as that could trace
functions in
On 20/01/15 20:53, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/20/2015 02:25 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> On 13/01/15 10:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
>>> Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
>>> of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last
On 20/01/15 20:53, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 01/20/2015 02:25 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 13/01/15 10:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
I
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:47:37 +
Daniel Thompson daniel.thomp...@linaro.org wrote:
With this patchset, is it possible to call sched_clock() from within NMI
context? I ask because the generic sched_clock() code is not NMI safe
That's not good. Better not run function tracing, as that could
On 21/01/15 13:06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:47:37 +
Daniel Thompson daniel.thomp...@linaro.org wrote:
With this patchset, is it possible to call sched_clock() from within NMI
context? I ask because the generic sched_clock() code is not NMI safe
That's not good.
On 01/20/2015 02:25 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 13/01/15 10:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
>> Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
>> of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
>> I posted them. The changes in
On 13/01/15 10:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
> Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
> of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
> I posted them. The changes in v14 tidy up the later part of the
> patch set in
On 13/01/15 10:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
I posted them. The changes in v14 tidy up the later part of the
patch set in order
On 01/20/2015 02:25 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 13/01/15 10:26, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
I posted them. The changes in v14 tidy up
Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
I posted them. The changes in v14 tidy up the later part of the
patch set in order to share more code between x86 and arm.
This
Hi Thomas, Hi Jason:
Patches 1 to 3 are for you (and should be separable from the rest
of the series). The patches haven't changes since the last time
I posted them. The changes in v14 tidy up the later part of the
patch set in order to share more code between x86 and arm.
This
14 matches
Mail list logo
