2017-04-19 10:08+0200, Christian Borntraeger:
> On 04/13/2017 10:19 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> The only user of KVM_MAX_VCPU is switched to kvm->max_vcpu.
>>
>> The limit could have been INT_MAX as it makes no difference, but there
>> is no point in making it bigger than KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID.
>>
>>
2017-04-19 10:08+0200, Christian Borntraeger:
> On 04/13/2017 10:19 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> The only user of KVM_MAX_VCPU is switched to kvm->max_vcpu.
>>
>> The limit could have been INT_MAX as it makes no difference, but there
>> is no point in making it bigger than KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID.
>>
>>
On 04/13/2017 10:19 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The only user of KVM_MAX_VCPU is switched to kvm->max_vcpu.
>
> The limit could have been INT_MAX as it makes no difference, but there
> is no point in making it bigger than KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
> ---
On 04/13/2017 10:19 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The only user of KVM_MAX_VCPU is switched to kvm->max_vcpu.
>
> The limit could have been INT_MAX as it makes no difference, but there
> is no point in making it bigger than KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
> ---
>
The only user of KVM_MAX_VCPU is switched to kvm->max_vcpu.
The limit could have been INT_MAX as it makes no difference, but there
is no point in making it bigger than KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
The only user of KVM_MAX_VCPU is switched to kvm->max_vcpu.
The limit could have been INT_MAX as it makes no difference, but there
is no point in making it bigger than KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 4
6 matches
Mail list logo