Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:20:54PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug > > them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never > > sent them in for

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:20:54PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug > > them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never > > sent them in for

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug > them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never > sent them in for inclusion on their own :( > > This is the start of the stable review

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug > them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never > sent them in for inclusion on their own :( > > This is the start of the stable review

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-13 Thread Shuah Khan
On 09/12/2016 10:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug > them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never > sent them in for inclusion on their own :( > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-13 Thread Shuah Khan
On 09/12/2016 10:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug > them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never > sent them in for inclusion on their own :( > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-12 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/12/2016 09:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never sent them in for inclusion on their own :( This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.21

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-12 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/12/2016 09:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never sent them in for inclusion on their own :( This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.21

[PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never sent them in for inclusion on their own :( This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.21 release. There are 192 patches in this series, all

[PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

2016-09-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree. I have no idea why they never sent them in for inclusion on their own :( This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.21 release. There are 192 patches in this series, all