* Oleg Nesterov [2012-11-23 21:28:12]:
> Add the new helper filter_chain(). Currently it is only placeholder,
> the comment explains what is should do. We will change it later to
> consult every consumer to decide whether we need to install the swbp.
> Until then it works as if any consumer
* Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com [2012-11-23 21:28:12]:
Add the new helper filter_chain(). Currently it is only placeholder,
the comment explains what is should do. We will change it later to
consult every consumer to decide whether we need to install the swbp.
Until then it works as if any
On 11/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Change install_breakpoint() to call filter_chain() instead of checking
> uprobe->consumers != NULL. We obviously need this, and this equally
> closes the race with _unregister().
>
> Change remove_breakpoint() to call this helper too. Currently this is
>
On 11/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Change install_breakpoint() to call filter_chain() instead of checking
uprobe-consumers != NULL. We obviously need this, and this equally
closes the race with _unregister().
Change remove_breakpoint() to call this helper too. Currently this is
pointless
Add the new helper filter_chain(). Currently it is only placeholder,
the comment explains what is should do. We will change it later to
consult every consumer to decide whether we need to install the swbp.
Until then it works as if any consumer returns true, this matches the
current behavior.
Add the new helper filter_chain(). Currently it is only placeholder,
the comment explains what is should do. We will change it later to
consult every consumer to decide whether we need to install the swbp.
Until then it works as if any consumer returns true, this matches the
current behavior.
6 matches
Mail list logo
