Hi!
> > > +static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
> > > +
> > > +static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + printk(KERN_INFO "APM Battery Driver\n");
> > > +
> > > + old_apm_get_power_status = apm_get_power_status;
> > > + apm_get_power_status =
Hi!
+static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
+
+static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
+{
+ printk(KERN_INFO APM Battery Driver\n);
+
+ old_apm_get_power_status = apm_get_power_status;
+ apm_get_power_status = apm_battery_apm_get_power_status;
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:08:29AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:24:21PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Utterly unsafe. What happens if some other module gets loaded which
> > does this, and then this module is unloaded followed by the other
> > module. Result: Oops.
Hello Russell,
Monday, April 16, 2007, 11:24:21 PM, you wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> +static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
>> +
>> +static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
>> +{
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "APM Battery
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:24:21PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > +static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
> > +
> > +static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
> > +{
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "APM Battery
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> +static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
> +
> +static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
> +{
> + printk(KERN_INFO "APM Battery Driver\n");
> +
> + old_apm_get_power_status = apm_get_power_status;
>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
+
+static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
+{
+ printk(KERN_INFO APM Battery Driver\n);
+
+ old_apm_get_power_status = apm_get_power_status;
+
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:24:21PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
+
+static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
+{
+ printk(KERN_INFO APM Battery Driver\n);
+
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:08:29AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:24:21PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
Utterly unsafe. What happens if some other module gets loaded which
does this, and then this module is unloaded followed by the other
module. Result: Oops.
Hello Russell,
Monday, April 16, 2007, 11:24:21 PM, you wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+static void (*old_apm_get_power_status)(struct apm_power_info*);
+
+static int __init apm_battery_init(void)
+{
+ printk(KERN_INFO APM Battery Driver\n);
+
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:26:44AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> It finds battery with "main_battery" flag set (or with max_capacity if no
> batteries marked as main), and converts battery values to APM form.
Changes:
- follows battery class changes
- minor cleanups
Subject: [PATCH] [take2]
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:26:44AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
It finds battery with main_battery flag set (or with max_capacity if no
batteries marked as main), and converts battery values to APM form.
Changes:
- follows battery class changes
- minor cleanups
Subject: [PATCH] [take2] APM
It finds battery with "main_battery" flag set (or with max_capacity if no
batteries marked as main), and converts battery values to APM form.
---
drivers/battery/Kconfig |7 +++
drivers/battery/Makefile|1 +
drivers/battery/apm_power.c | 121
It finds battery with main_battery flag set (or with max_capacity if no
batteries marked as main), and converts battery values to APM form.
---
drivers/battery/Kconfig |7 +++
drivers/battery/Makefile|1 +
drivers/battery/apm_power.c | 121
14 matches
Mail list logo
