On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 01:24:59 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 22:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > I mean Jan Schönherr's patches that should fix this are
> > > likely to be picked up one day.
> > >
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 22:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > I mean Jan Schönherr's patches that should fix this are
> > likely to be picked up one day.
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/13/678
>
> Till then, we need the
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 22:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
I mean Jan Schönherr's patches that should fix this are
likely to be picked up one day.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/13/678
Till then, we need the patch you
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 01:24:59 PM Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 22:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
I mean Jan Schönherr's patches that should fix this are
likely to be picked up one day.
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > > > Previously a new line is
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > > Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
> > >
> > > [7.185182] pci
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
> >
> > [7.185182] pci 0001:00:12.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > [7.191352] pci
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
>
> [7.185182] pci 0001:00:12.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> [7.191352] pci 0001:00:12.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
> [7.195956] - using ISA IRQ 10
>
> The
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
[7.185182] pci 0001:00:12.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
[7.191352] pci 0001:00:12.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
[7.195956] - using ISA IRQ 10
The code thus
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
[7.185182] pci 0001:00:12.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
[7.191352] pci 0001:00:12.0: PCI
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Previously a new line is implicitly added in the no GSI case:
[7.185182] pci 0001:00:12.0: can't
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:53:55 PM Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 21:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 05:46:04 AM Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 16:43 +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Previously a new line is implicitly added
12 matches
Mail list logo
