On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:01 PM John Garry wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2024 10:08, John Garry wrote:
> > On 05/02/2024 23:10, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> I think what you can contribute are:
>
> - Explore the UTS_RELEASE users, and check if you can get rid of it.
> >>> Unfortunately I expec
On 08/02/2024 10:08, John Garry wrote:
On 05/02/2024 23:10, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
I think what you can contribute are:
- Explore the UTS_RELEASE users, and check if you can get rid of it.
Unfortunately I expect resistance for this. I also expect places like FW
loader it is necessary. And w
On 05/02/2024 23:10, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
I think what you can contribute are:
- Explore the UTS_RELEASE users, and check if you can get rid of it.
Unfortunately I expect resistance for this. I also expect places like FW
loader it is necessary. And when this is used in sysfs, people will s
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 5:25 PM John Garry wrote:
>
> On 02/02/2024 15:01, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> --
> >> 2.35.3
> >
> > As you see, several drivers store UTS_RELEASE in their driver data,
> > and even print it in debug print.
> >
> >
> > I do not see why it is useful.
>
> I would tend to agre
On 02/02/2024 15:01, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
--
2.35.3
As you see, several drivers store UTS_RELEASE in their driver data,
and even print it in debug print.
I do not see why it is useful.
I would tend to agree, and mentioned that earlier.
As you discussed in 3/4, if UTS_RELEASE is unneeded
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 00:01:26 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> I do not see why it is useful.
> As you discussed in 3/4, if UTS_RELEASE is unneeded,
> it is better to get rid of it.
To be clear - the discussion on 3/4 was about the fact that netdev
already prints UTS_RELEASE into the version member of
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:49 PM John Garry wrote:
>
> When hacking it is a waste of time and compute energy that we need to
> rebuild much kernel code just for changing the head git commit, like this:
>
> > touch include/generated/utsrelease.h
> > time make -j3
> mkdir -p /home/john/mnt_sda4/john
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:16:09PM +, John Garry wrote:
> On 31/01/2024 16:22, Greg KH wrote:
> > > before:
> > > real0m53.591s
> > > user1m1.842s
> > > sys 0m9.161s
> > >
> > > after:
> > > real0m37.481s
> > > user0m46.461s
> > > sys 0m7.199s
> > >
> > > Sending as an
On 31/01/2024 16:22, Greg KH wrote:
before:
real0m53.591s
user1m1.842s
sys 0m9.161s
after:
real0m37.481s
user0m46.461s
sys 0m7.199s
Sending as an RFC as I need to test more of the conversions and I would
like to also convert more UTS_RELEASE users to prove this is proper
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:48:47AM +, John Garry wrote:
> When hacking it is a waste of time and compute energy that we need to
> rebuild much kernel code just for changing the head git commit, like this:
>
> > touch include/generated/utsrelease.h
> > time make -j3
> mkdir -p /home/john/mnt_
When hacking it is a waste of time and compute energy that we need to
rebuild much kernel code just for changing the head git commit, like this:
> touch include/generated/utsrelease.h
> time make -j3
mkdir -p /home/john/mnt_sda4/john/kernel-dev2/tools/objtool && make
O=/home/john/mnt_sda4/john/
11 matches
Mail list logo
