On 06/02/2013 02:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but jer...@goop.org is my canonical
On 06/02/2013 02:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge jeremy.fitzhardi...@citrix.com
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
>
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but jer...@goop.org is my canonical email address. The Citrix address
is dead and
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Rather than outright replacing the entire spinlock implementation in
order to paravirtualize it, keep the ticket lock implementation but add
a couple of pvops hooks on the slow patch (long spin on lock, unlocking
a
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge jeremy.fitzhardi...@citrix.com
Rather than outright replacing the entire spinlock implementation in
order to paravirtualize it, keep the ticket lock implementation but add
a couple of pvops hooks on the slow patch
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge jeremy.fitzhardi...@citrix.com
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but jer...@goop.org is my canonical email address. The Citrix
6 matches
Mail list logo