On Wednesday 04 September 2013, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 09/04/2013 10:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > Anyways, having a custom .init_time gives you full control over
> > of_clk_init and clocksource_of_init back again
On Wednesday 04 September 2013, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 09/04/2013 10:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Anyways, having a custom .init_time gives you full control over
of_clk_init and clocksource_of_init back again thanks
Hi Sebastian,
+Michal
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
[ ... ]
> For mach-zynq I prepared a patch set that brings it close to .init_time
> removal. I have pushed it to
> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git zynq-clk-init-v1
> and will maybe post a
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 10:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >[ ... ]
> >>For mach-zynq I prepared a patch set that brings it close to .init_time
>
On 09/04/2013 10:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
[ ... ]
For mach-zynq I prepared a patch set that brings it close to .init_time
removal. I have pushed it to
https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git zynq-clk-init-v1
and
On 08/29/2013 03:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Please be careful with the patch ordering here. The patch series should
be bisectable, i.e. no patch should ever knowingly break any of the
platforms, with the fix getting added in a later patch.
You should be able to do that by cleaning up all
On 08/29/2013 03:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Please be careful with the patch ordering here. The patch series should
be bisectable, i.e. no patch should ever knowingly break any of the
platforms, with the fix getting added in a later patch.
You should be able to do that by cleaning up all
On 09/04/2013 10:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
[ ... ]
For mach-zynq I prepared a patch set that brings it close to .init_time
removal. I have pushed it to
https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git zynq-clk-init-v1
and
Hi Sebastian,
+Michal
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
[ ... ]
For mach-zynq I prepared a patch set that brings it close to .init_time
removal. I have pushed it to
https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git zynq-clk-init-v1
and will maybe post a
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 09/04/2013 10:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
[ ... ]
For mach-zynq I prepared a patch set that brings it close to .init_time
removal.
On Wednesday 28 August 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >
> > This forces zynq to move some initialization our clock code relies on to
> > init_irq(). Also, the current code already takes an approach of
> > doing either common init or machine specific init.
>
> Soeren,
>
> you know that
On Wednesday 28 August 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
This forces zynq to move some initialization our clock code relies on to
init_irq(). Also, the current code already takes an approach of
doing either common init or machine specific init.
Soeren,
you know that patch 16/16
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:58:39AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 08/28/13 00:19, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
> >>Currently, arch/arm machs
On 08/28/13 00:19, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
clocksource_of_init. This
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
> Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
> clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the
Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the default
hook instead. clk_of_init is safe to call for non-DT platforms, so add
Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the default
hook instead. clk_of_init is safe to call for non-DT platforms, so add
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the default
On 08/28/13 00:19, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
clocksource_of_init. This
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:58:39AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 08/28/13 00:19, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
Currently, arch/arm machs use
20 matches
Mail list logo
