Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 03/16/2015 03:02 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:59:10 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> * Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: >> >>> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. >> >> So Paul remided us about the dead

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:59:10 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: > > >Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. > > So Paul remided us about the dead lock thingy that has been reported. > Users reported that

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: >Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. So Paul remided us about the dead lock thingy that has been reported. Users reported that it does not occur with v3.18-RT and they think it is due to 'Revert "timers: do

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 03/16/2015 03:02 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:59:10 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de wrote: * Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. So Paul remided us about the

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-16 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. So Paul remided us about the dead lock thingy that has been reported. Users reported that it does not occur with v3.18-RT and they think it is due to 'Revert timers: do not

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:59:10 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de wrote: * Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. So Paul remided us about the dead lock thingy that has been reported. Users

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:11:35 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:49:13AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Dear RT Folks, > > > > > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:49:13AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Dear RT Folks, > > > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. > > > > Please scream at me if I messed something up. > > Hm, in both 12/14 series,

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 05:49:13 +0100 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Dear RT Folks, > > > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. > > > > Please scream at me if I messed something up. > > Hm, in both 12/14 series, 21/N

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: >Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. There is also "[PATCH v3.14-rt] netpoll: guard the access to dev->npinfo with rcu_read_lock/unlock" which I did not apply because the code is gone in v3.18. I stopped

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: >Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. Could you add Mike's "3.14.23-rt20 - fs,btrfs: fix rt deadlock on extent_buffer->loc" [0] and that is the upper chunk (ctree.c only). As I mentioned in the thread, the code

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. Could you add Mike's 3.14.23-rt20 - fs,btrfs: fix rt deadlock on extent_buffer-loc [0] and that is the upper chunk (ctree.c only). As I mentioned in the thread, the code is

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Steven Rostedt | 2015-03-12 15:13:07 [-0400]: Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. There is also [PATCH v3.14-rt] netpoll: guard the access to dev-npinfo with rcu_read_lock/unlock which I did not apply because the code is gone in v3.18. I stopped looking

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:11:35 -0400 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:49:13AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1.

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:49:13AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. Please scream at me if I messed something up. Hm, in both 12/14 series, 21/N went on

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 05:49:13 +0100 Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. Please scream at me if I messed something up. Hm, in both 12/14

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-12 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Dear RT Folks, > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. > > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Hm, in both 12/14 series, 21/N went on a walkabout. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release

Re: [PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-12 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. Please scream at me if I messed something up. Hm, in both 12/14 series, 21/N went on a walkabout. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH RT 00/39] Linux 3.14.34-rt32-rc1

2015-03-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
Dear RT Folks, This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.34-rt32-rc1. Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release