On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>>Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches
>> 1-13) that needs to be addressed? Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI
>> stub implemented based on these
On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
>Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches
> 1-13) that needs to be addressed? Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI
> stub implemented based on these patches, so the common code has now
> been tested with
On Fri, 23 Aug, at 03:40:04PM, Roy Franz wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
>Do you have a tree I can monitor to see if you have taken this?
> Would you like me to split out the x86/common only changes into a
> separate series from the ARM changes?
I've just returned from my honeymoon. I'll reply to your
On Fri, 23 Aug, at 03:40:04PM, Roy Franz wrote:
Hi Matt,
Do you have a tree I can monitor to see if you have taken this?
Would you like me to split out the x86/common only changes into a
separate series from the ARM changes?
I've just returned from my honeymoon. I'll reply to your emails
On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote:
Hi Matt,
Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches
1-13) that needs to be addressed? Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI
stub implemented based on these patches, so the common code has now
been tested with another
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Matt Fleming m...@console-pimps.org wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote:
Hi Matt,
Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches
1-13) that needs to be addressed? Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI
stub implemented
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Roy Franz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Roy Franz wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Roy Franz wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
>>> Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
Some code that
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Roy Franz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Roy Franz wrote:
>>
>> This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
>> Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now shared
>> and has been made more general. The stub for
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now shared
and has been made
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Roy Franz wrote:
>
> This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
> Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now shared
> and has been made more general. The stub for ARM is implemented in
> a similar manner to x86 in that it
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 18:13 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
> >> * Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
> >> first educated guess is inadequate.
> >
> > With this
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 18:13 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
* Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
first educated guess is inadequate.
With
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now shared
and has been made more general. The stub for ARM is implemented in
a similar manner to
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
>> * Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
>> first educated guess is inadequate.
>
> With this change, it looks like you no longer free the original cmdline
>
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
> * Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
> first educated guess is inadequate.
With this change, it looks like you no longer free the original cmdline
and fdt memory. The current flow looks like:
retry:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
* Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
first educated guess is inadequate.
With this change, it looks like you no longer free the original cmdline
and fdt memory. The current flow looks like:
retry:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
* Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
first educated guess is inadequate.
With this change, it looks like you no longer free the original
This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now shared
and has been made more general. The stub for ARM is implemented in
a similar manner to x86 in that it is a shim layer between EFI and
the normal zImage/bzImage
This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture.
Some code that was previously only used by x86/x86_64 is now shared
and has been made more general. The stub for ARM is implemented in
a similar manner to x86 in that it is a shim layer between EFI and
the normal zImage/bzImage
20 matches
Mail list logo
