Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-22 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dave Kleikamp writes: > On 01/18/2013 03:48 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Dave Kleikamp writes: >> >>> On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer writes: > ./check -g aio > > and here is the summary: > > Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 >

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-22 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com writes: On 01/18/2013 03:48 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com writes: On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: ./check -g aio and here is the summary: Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-20 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:16:35PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Dave Kleikamp writes: > > > This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for > > review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up > > where he left off, porting his patches to the latest

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-20 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:16:35PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com writes: This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up where he left off, porting his patches to

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 01/18/2013 03:48 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Dave Kleikamp writes: > >> On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Jeff Moyer writes: >>> ./check -g aio and here is the summary: Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 Failures: 112 198 207 239 240

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dave Kleikamp writes: > On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Jeff Moyer writes: >> >>> ./check -g aio >>> >>> and here is the summary: >>> >>> Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 >>> Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 >>> Failed 5 of 11 tests >>> >>> To be fair, I have not yet

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Jeff Moyer writes: > >> ./check -g aio >> >> and here is the summary: >> >> Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 >> Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 >> Failed 5 of 11 tests >> >> To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Moyer
Jeff Moyer writes: > ./check -g aio > > and here is the summary: > > Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 > Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 > Failed 5 of 11 tests > > To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your changes. I re-ran the same test against a vanilla

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dave Kleikamp writes: > This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for > review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up > where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel > and adding support more file systems. [snip] > My hopes

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com writes: This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel and adding support more file systems.

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Moyer
Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: ./check -g aio and here is the summary: Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 Failed 5 of 11 tests To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your changes. I re-ran the same test against a vanilla

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: ./check -g aio and here is the summary: Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 Failed 5 of 11 tests To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Jeff Moyer
Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com writes: On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: ./check -g aio and here is the summary: Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 Failed 5 of 11 tests To be fair, I have

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 01/18/2013 03:48 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com writes: On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: ./check -g aio and here is the summary: Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 Failures: 112 198 207 239 240

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-17 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 19:25 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:32 PM, James Bottomley > wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:58 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > >> This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for > >> review in October, 2009. Feedback was

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-17 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 19:25 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:32 PM, James Bottomley jbottom...@parallels.com wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:58 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009.

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:32 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:58 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: >> This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for >> review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up >> where he left off, porting his

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-16 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:58 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for > review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up > where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel > and adding support more

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-16 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:58 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel and adding support more file

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:32 PM, James Bottomley jbottom...@parallels.com wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:58 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up where he left

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On 01/10/2013 09:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> I am using here Ubuntu/precise AMD64 as a WUBI-installed system. >> >> Not sure if WUBI [1] is a good test-candidate. >> >> [ /boot/grub/grub.cfg ] >> ... >> set

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Dave Kleikamp dave.kleik...@oracle.com wrote: On 01/10/2013 09:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: Hi Dave, I am using here Ubuntu/precise AMD64 as a WUBI-installed system. Not sure if WUBI [1] is a good test-candidate. [ /boot/grub/grub.cfg ] ... set

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-11 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 01/10/2013 09:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I am using here Ubuntu/precise AMD64 as a WUBI-installed system. > > Not sure if WUBI [1] is a good test-candidate. > > [ /boot/grub/grub.cfg ] > ... > set root=(loop0) > linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-rc2-9-iniza-generic >

Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-11 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On 01/10/2013 09:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: Hi Dave, I am using here Ubuntu/precise AMD64 as a WUBI-installed system. Not sure if WUBI [1] is a good test-candidate. [ /boot/grub/grub.cfg ] ... set root=(loop0) linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-rc2-9-iniza-generic

[PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-09 Thread Dave Kleikamp
This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel and adding support more file systems. This patch series adds a kernel interface to

[PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

2013-01-09 Thread Dave Kleikamp
This patchset was begun by Zach Brown and was originally submitted for review in October, 2009. Feedback was positive, and I have picked up where he left off, porting his patches to the latest mainline kernel and adding support more file systems. This patch series adds a kernel interface to