Re: [PATCH kernel v9 08/32] vfio: powerpc/spapr: Moving pinning/unpinning to helpers

2015-04-28 Thread David Gibson
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:14:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > This is a pretty mechanical patch to make next patches simpler. > > New tce_iommu_unuse_page() helper does put_page() now but it might skip > that after the memory registering patch applied. > > As we are here, this removes

Re: [PATCH kernel v9 08/32] vfio: powerpc/spapr: Moving pinning/unpinning to helpers

2015-04-28 Thread David Gibson
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:14:32PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: This is a pretty mechanical patch to make next patches simpler. New tce_iommu_unuse_page() helper does put_page() now but it might skip that after the memory registering patch applied. As we are here, this removes

[PATCH kernel v9 08/32] vfio: powerpc/spapr: Moving pinning/unpinning to helpers

2015-04-25 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
This is a pretty mechanical patch to make next patches simpler. New tce_iommu_unuse_page() helper does put_page() now but it might skip that after the memory registering patch applied. As we are here, this removes unnecessary checks for a value returned by pfn_to_page() as it cannot possibly

[PATCH kernel v9 08/32] vfio: powerpc/spapr: Moving pinning/unpinning to helpers

2015-04-25 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
This is a pretty mechanical patch to make next patches simpler. New tce_iommu_unuse_page() helper does put_page() now but it might skip that after the memory registering patch applied. As we are here, this removes unnecessary checks for a value returned by pfn_to_page() as it cannot possibly