From: Niklas Cassel
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:33:29 +0200
> From: Niklas Cassel
>
> Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
> TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
> however, to avoid
From: Niklas Cassel
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:33:29 +0200
> From: Niklas Cassel
>
> Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
> TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
> however, to avoid relying on undefined behavior, set the length in
On 4/10/2017 8:33 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
however, to avoid relying on undefined behavior, set the length in
On 4/10/2017 8:33 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
however, to avoid relying on undefined behavior, set the length in TDES3.
The field has a
On 04/11/2017 10:48 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Às 7:33 PM de 4/10/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
>> From: Niklas Cassel
>>
>> Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
>> TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not
On 04/11/2017 10:48 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Às 7:33 PM de 4/10/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
>> From: Niklas Cassel
>>
>> Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
>> TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
>> however, to
Hi Niklas,
Às 7:33 PM de 4/10/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
> From: Niklas Cassel
>
> Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
> TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
> however, to avoid relying on undefined
Hi Niklas,
Às 7:33 PM de 4/10/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu:
> From: Niklas Cassel
>
> Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
> TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
> however, to avoid relying on undefined behavior, set the length in
Hi,
On 04/11/2017 07:40 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hi Niklas
patch looks ok for me, Alex any feedback?
It sounds good for me to.
peppe
On 4/10/2017 8:33 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
Hi,
On 04/11/2017 07:40 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hi Niklas
patch looks ok for me, Alex any feedback?
It sounds good for me to.
peppe
On 4/10/2017 8:33 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be
Hi Niklas
patch looks ok for me, Alex any feedback?
peppe
On 4/10/2017 8:33 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
however, to
Hi Niklas
patch looks ok for me, Alex any feedback?
peppe
On 4/10/2017 8:33 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
however, to avoid relying on
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
however, to avoid relying on undefined behavior, set the length in TDES3.
The field has a different meaning
From: Niklas Cassel
Field FL/TPL in register TDES3 is not correctly set on GMAC4.
TX appears to be functional on GMAC 4.10a even if this field is not set,
however, to avoid relying on undefined behavior, set the length in TDES3.
The field has a different meaning depending on if the TSE bit in
14 matches
Mail list logo