Hi David,
On 15-08-11 12:05:18, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
>
> Done.
Thank you, this is much appreciated.
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
> Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>>
>>> From: Florian Fainelli
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>>
Put
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>
>> From: Florian Fainelli
>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>
>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>>> history vs. breaking
Hi David,
On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>
>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
>
> I never will rewrite
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
I never will rewrite history, ever.
Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.
--
To unsubscribe
On 11/08/15 10:38, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
>> won't fix the bisectability issue.
>>
>> Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
> I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
> won't fix the bisectability issue.
>
> Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
> f1d5ca4: "Merge branch
Hi David,
On Aug 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vivien Didelot
>> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
>>
>> > This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the
Hi David,
On Aug 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
wrote:
Hi David,
On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
This patchset refactors the DSA and
From: Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
I never will rewrite history, ever.
Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
won't fix the bisectability issue.
Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
f1d5ca4: Merge
On 11/08/15 10:38, David Miller wrote:
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
won't fix the bisectability issue.
Instead of fixing individual portions,
Hi David,
On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
I never
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
Put differently, my question is how do you
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
Hi David,
On 15-08-11 12:05:18, David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
Done.
Thank you, this is much appreciated.
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi David,
On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
>
> > This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
> > objects.
>
> Series applied, thanks.
I noticed you didn't push the serie yet. I've just sent
Hi David,
On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
objects.
Series applied, thanks.
I noticed you didn't push the
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
> This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
> objects.
Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
From: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
objects.
Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
objects.
The first two patches add minor but necessary changes to switchdev, the third
one implements the switchdev glue in DSA for FDB routines, and the remaining
ones refactor the FDB access functions in the mv88e6xxx
This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
objects.
The first two patches add minor but necessary changes to switchdev, the third
one implements the switchdev glue in DSA for FDB routines, and the remaining
ones refactor the FDB access functions in the mv88e6xxx
24 matches
Mail list logo
