On 15-08-06 16:04:32, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Vivien
>
> Thanks for splitting up the big patch. This it is much easier to
> review now.
>
> Is this patch git bisectable?
In terms of compilation, yes.
> Clearly after this patch, but before all the other patches are in, we
> will not be
Hi Vivien
Thanks for splitting up the big patch. This it is much easier to
review now.
Is this patch git bisectable?
Clearly after this patch, but before all the other patches are in, we
will not be programming the hardware. The call into the driver is
removed here, but the replacement is added
Hi Vivien
Thanks for splitting up the big patch. This it is much easier to
review now.
Is this patch git bisectable?
Clearly after this patch, but before all the other patches are in, we
will not be programming the hardware. The call into the driver is
removed here, but the replacement is added
On 15-08-06 16:04:32, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Hi Vivien
Thanks for splitting up the big patch. This it is much easier to
review now.
Is this patch git bisectable?
In terms of compilation, yes.
Clearly after this patch, but before all the other patches are in, we
will not be programming the
Remove the fdb_{add,del,getnext} function pointer in favor of new
port_fdb_{add,del,getnext}.
Implement the switchdev_port_obj_{add,del,dump} functions in DSA to
support the SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_FDB objects.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6171.c | 3 -
Remove the fdb_{add,del,getnext} function pointer in favor of new
port_fdb_{add,del,getnext}.
Implement the switchdev_port_obj_{add,del,dump} functions in DSA to
support the SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_FDB objects.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
