On 05/03/14 12:16, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:32:12PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Storing the pending_idx at the first byte of the linear buffer never looked
good, skb->cb is a more proper place for this. It also prevents the header to
be directly grant copied there, and we don't
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:32:12PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Storing the pending_idx at the first byte of the linear buffer never looked
> good, skb->cb is a more proper place for this. It also prevents the header to
> be directly grant copied there, and we don't have the pending_idx after we
>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:32:12PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Storing the pending_idx at the first byte of the linear buffer never looked
good, skb-cb is a more proper place for this. It also prevents the header to
be directly grant copied there, and we don't have the pending_idx after we
On 05/03/14 12:16, Wei Liu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:32:12PM +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Storing the pending_idx at the first byte of the linear buffer never looked
good, skb-cb is a more proper place for this. It also prevents the header to
be directly grant copied there, and we don't
Storing the pending_idx at the first byte of the linear buffer never looked
good, skb->cb is a more proper place for this. It also prevents the header to
be directly grant copied there, and we don't have the pending_idx after we
copied the header here, so it's time to change it.
Signed-off-by:
Storing the pending_idx at the first byte of the linear buffer never looked
good, skb-cb is a more proper place for this. It also prevents the header to
be directly grant copied there, and we don't have the pending_idx after we
copied the header here, so it's time to change it.
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo
