Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/88] atomics: Add header comment so spin_unlock_wait()

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:58:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > There is material describing the ordering guarantees provided by > spin_unlock_wait(), but it is not necessarily easy to find. This commit > therefore adds a docbook header comment to this function informally > describing its

Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/88] atomics: Add header comment so spin_unlock_wait()

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:58:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > There is material describing the ordering guarantees provided by > spin_unlock_wait(), but it is not necessarily easy to find. This commit > therefore adds a docbook header comment to this function informally > describing its

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/88] atomics: Add header comment so spin_unlock_wait()

There is material describing the ordering guarantees provided by spin_unlock_wait(), but it is not necessarily easy to find. This commit therefore adds a docbook header comment to this function informally describing its semantics. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/88] atomics: Add header comment so spin_unlock_wait()

There is material describing the ordering guarantees provided by spin_unlock_wait(), but it is not necessarily easy to find. This commit therefore adds a docbook header comment to this function informally describing its semantics. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra ---