Yeah sure Stephen.
On 5/5/2018 8:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
Hello Stephen,
I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Yeah sure Stephen.
On 5/5/2018 8:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
Hello Stephen,
I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
> Hello Stephen,
>
> I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
> Hello Stephen,
>
> I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
Hello Stephen,
I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
On 5/2/2018 12:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-30 22:03:33)
@@ -45,15 +50,28 @@
#define domain_to_gdsc(domain) container_of(domain, struct gdsc, pd)
-static int gdsc_is_enabled(struct gdsc *sc,
Hello Stephen,
I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
On 5/2/2018 12:27 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-30 22:03:33)
@@ -45,15 +50,28 @@
#define domain_to_gdsc(domain) container_of(domain, struct gdsc, pd)
-static int gdsc_is_enabled(struct gdsc *sc,
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-30 22:03:33)
> @@ -45,15 +50,28 @@
>
> #define domain_to_gdsc(domain) container_of(domain, struct gdsc, pd)
>
> -static int gdsc_is_enabled(struct gdsc *sc, unsigned int reg)
> +static int gdsc_is_enabled(struct gdsc *sc, bool en)
> {
> + unsigned int reg;
>
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-30 22:03:33)
> @@ -45,15 +50,28 @@
>
> #define domain_to_gdsc(domain) container_of(domain, struct gdsc, pd)
>
> -static int gdsc_is_enabled(struct gdsc *sc, unsigned int reg)
> +static int gdsc_is_enabled(struct gdsc *sc, bool en)
> {
> + unsigned int reg;
>
From: Amit Nischal
The default behavior of the GDSC enable/disable sequence is to
poll the status bits of either the actual GDSCR or the
corresponding HW_CTRL registers.
On targets which have support for a CFG_GDSCR register, the
status bits might not show the correct
From: Amit Nischal
The default behavior of the GDSC enable/disable sequence is to
poll the status bits of either the actual GDSCR or the
corresponding HW_CTRL registers.
On targets which have support for a CFG_GDSCR register, the
status bits might not show the correct state of the GDSC,
10 matches
Mail list logo