Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-28 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > > Roland, so M2 starts worrying, you have picked into your for-next > > branch yesterday the other pending series, but not this one, so? > > Who is M2? me too -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-28 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2014, Roland Dreier wrote: > >> > Roland, we're soon on -rc6 and there's no reason for this to miss >>> 3.16, could you please comment whether you want it to go through your >>> tree or net-next? >> I will pick it up. > Thanks

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-28 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2014, Roland Dreier wrote: Roland, we're soon on -rc6 and there's no reason for this to miss 3.16, could you please comment whether you want it to go through your tree or net-next? I will pick it up.

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-28 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Roland Dreier roland.dre...@gmail.com wrote: Roland, so M2 starts worrying, you have picked into your for-next branch yesterday the other pending series, but not this one, so? Who is M2? me too -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-26 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Roland, we're soon on -rc6 and there's no reason for this to miss > > 3.16, could you please comment whether you want it to go through your > > tree or net-next? > > I will pick it up. Thanks Roland. Sorry for being a bit persistent, but another

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-26 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Roland Dreier wrote: Roland, we're soon on -rc6 and there's no reason for this to miss 3.16, could you please comment whether you want it to go through your tree or net-next? I will pick it up. Thanks Roland. Sorry for being a bit persistent, but another week has

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-19 Thread Roland Dreier
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Roland, we're soon on -rc6 and there's no reason for this to miss > 3.16, could you please comment whether you want it to go through your > tree or net-next? I will pick it up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-19 Thread Roland Dreier
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote: Roland, we're soon on -rc6 and there's no reason for this to miss 3.16, could you please comment whether you want it to go through your tree or net-next? I will pick it up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-17 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Sun, 11 May 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> This series is a refactored form of the one posted by Jiri Kosina >> to LKML and netdev according to the discussion that followed >> and the guidelines you provided here

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-17 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote: On Sun, 11 May 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote: This series is a refactored form of the one posted by Jiri Kosina to LKML and netdev according to the discussion that followed and the guidelines you provided here

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-13 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote: > This series is a refactored form of the one posted by Jiri Kosina > to LKML and netdev according to the discussion that followed > and the guidelines you provided here https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/250 > > Basically, the functionality changes introduced

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-13 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote: This series is a refactored form of the one posted by Jiri Kosina to LKML and netdev according to the discussion that followed and the guidelines you provided here https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/250 Basically, the functionality changes introduced by

[PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-11 Thread Or Gerlitz
Hi Roland, This series is a refactored form of the one posted by Jiri Kosina to LKML and netdev according to the discussion that followed and the guidelines you provided here https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/250 Basically, the functionality changes introduced by this series fully reside on the

[PATCH v1 for-next 0/3] IB: Use GFP_NOIO calls in IPoIB connected mode TX path

2014-05-11 Thread Or Gerlitz
Hi Roland, This series is a refactored form of the one posted by Jiri Kosina to LKML and netdev according to the discussion that followed and the guidelines you provided here https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/250 Basically, the functionality changes introduced by this series fully reside on the