On 2015/3/17 22:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:10:02 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:10:02 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/17
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:35:36 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:23:11AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Do you mean remove CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP and
> > >
> > > +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
> > >
> > > as well (also need to remove
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:23:11AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
> > Do you mean remove CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP and
> >
> > +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
> >
> > as well (also need to remove duplicate #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP in sleep.c
> > if
> > we doing so)?
>
> Well,
On 2015/3/17 13:59, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>>> outside of the
On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used
On 2015/3/17 13:59, Jon Masters wrote:
On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
outside of the
On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used for
On 2015/3/17 22:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:10:02 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:23:11AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Do you mean remove CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP and
+acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
as well (also need to remove duplicate #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP in sleep.c
if
we doing so)?
Well, almost. There is
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:10:02 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J.
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:35:36 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 03:23:11AM +, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Do you mean remove CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP and
+acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
as well (also need to remove duplicate #ifdef
On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, March 16, 2015
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年03月14日
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 13, 2015
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> [...]
>
>
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
index
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> From: Graeme Gregory
> >>
> >> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> >> ACPI code will call
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
index 074e52b..e8728d7 100644
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
diff --git
On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for
On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory
>
> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
> for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
>
From: Graeme Gregory
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
and select it for x86 and ia64 only to make sleep functions available,
On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
and select it for x86 and ia64 only to make
On 2015/3/13 6:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 08:39:32 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
>> ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
>> for device power
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 08:39:32 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory
>
> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
> for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:32PM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory
>
> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
> for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:32PM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce
On 2015/3/13 6:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 08:39:32 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 08:39:32 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce
From: Graeme Gregory
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
and select it for x86 and ia64 only to make sleep functions available,
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() and acpi_sleep_init()
for device power management, so introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
and select it for x86 and ia64 only to make
38 matches
Mail list logo
