Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 18:05, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: >>> I might be able to find some time to implement a proof of concept which >>> would allow your platforms to get dual-role with code we already have, >>> but I need DWC3's OTG support which, I'm assuming,

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 18:05, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: >>> I might be able to find some time to implement a proof of concept which >>> would allow your platforms to get dual-role with code we already have, >>> but I need DWC3's OTG support which, I'm assuming, you already have

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 06:05:25PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: > >> I might be able to find some time to implement a proof of concept which > >> would allow your platforms to get dual-role with code we already have, > >> but I need DWC3's OTG

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 06:05:25PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: > >> I might be able to find some time to implement a proof of concept which > >> would allow your platforms to get dual-role with code we already have, > >> but I need DWC3's OTG support which, I'm

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

y...@intel.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>; Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdw...@gmail.com>; Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kerne

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux Hi, [I have to resend my reply. The previous reply was failed to deliver to usb mailing list. Sorry for inconvenience.] On 06/08/2016 11:04 AM, Jun Li wrote: Whether controller drivers want to use

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

rnel.org>; linux- > u...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> writes: > >> I might be able to find some time to impleme

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Girdwood > ; Mark Brown ; linux- > u...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: > >> I might be able to find some time to implement a p

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, Roger Quadros writes: >> I might be able to find some time to implement a proof of concept which >> would allow your platforms to get dual-role with code we already have, >> but I need DWC3's OTG support which, I'm assuming, you already have :-) >> >> If you wanna try

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, Roger Quadros writes: >> I might be able to find some time to implement a proof of concept which >> would allow your platforms to get dual-role with code we already have, >> but I need DWC3's OTG support which, I'm assuming, you already have :-) >> >> If you wanna try something offline,

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 16:04, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: >>> But you said I must run an unnecessary OTG state machine, even thought it >>> has nothing to do with my system, only because the two sides of my port >>> mux device is a host and peripheral controller.

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 16:04, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Roger Quadros writes: >>> But you said I must run an unnecessary OTG state machine, even thought it >>> has nothing to do with my system, only because the two sides of my port >>> mux device is a host and peripheral controller. >> >> We have a

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, Roger Quadros writes: >> But you said I must run an unnecessary OTG state machine, even thought it >> has nothing to do with my system, only because the two sides of my port >> mux device is a host and peripheral controller. > > We have a minimal dual-role state machine that

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, Roger Quadros writes: >> But you said I must run an unnecessary OTG state machine, even thought it >> has nothing to do with my system, only because the two sides of my port >> mux device is a host and peripheral controller. > > We have a minimal dual-role state machine that just looks at

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 12:53, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: >> Hi Roger >> >>> >>> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use >>> OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for >>> OTG/dual-role. >> That's the only

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 12:53, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: >> Hi Roger >> >>> >>> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use >>> OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for >>> OTG/dual-role. >> That's the only

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 12:27, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/07/2016 02:34 PM, Jun Li wrote: On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: >> Hi Roger >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On 07/06/16 12:27, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/07/2016 02:34 PM, Jun Li wrote: On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: >> Hi Roger >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: > Hi Roger > >> >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use >> OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for >> OTG/dual-role. > That's the only point we have concern, do dual role switch

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: > Hi Roger > >> >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use >> OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for >> OTG/dual-role. > That's the only point we have concern, do dual role switch

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/07/2016 02:34 PM, Jun Li wrote: >> > On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: >>> > > Hi Roger >>> > > > >> > >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ > >> use OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user > >> space for

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/07/2016 02:34 PM, Jun Li wrote: >> > On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: >>> > > Hi Roger >>> > > > >> > >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ > >> use OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user > >> space for

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

t; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > Hi Jun, > > On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: > > Hi Roger > > > >> > >> For Mux devices imple

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

ogerus ; > Liam Girdwood ; Mark Brown ; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > Hi Jun, > > On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: > > Hi Roger > > > >&g

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Jun, On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: > Hi Roger > >> >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use >> OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for >> OTG/dual-role. > That's the only point we have concern, do dual role switch

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Jun, On 06/07/2016 11:03 AM, Jun Li wrote: > Hi Roger > >> >> For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use >> OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for >> OTG/dual-role. > That's the only point we have concern, do dual role switch

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Roger > > For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use > OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for > OTG/dual-role. That's the only point we have concern, do dual role switch through OTG/dual-role core, not do it by itself. > >

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Roger > > For Mux devices implementing dual-role, the mux device driver _must_ use > OTG/dual-role core API so that a common ABI is presented to user space for > OTG/dual-role. That's the only point we have concern, do dual role switch through OTG/dual-role core, not do it by itself. > >

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/06/2016 03:02 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > >> But this code is better co-work with OTG/Dual-role framework, we'd > >> better have only interface that the user can know which role for the > >> current port. > >> OTG/Dual-role framework and portmux framework are not

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/06/2016 03:02 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > >> But this code is better co-work with OTG/Dual-role framework, we'd > >> better have only interface that the user can know which role for the > >> current port. > >> OTG/Dual-role framework and portmux framework are not

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:04:48AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/06/2016 09:25 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:04:48AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/06/2016 09:25 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/06/16 06:04, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/06/2016 09:25 AM, Peter Chen wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> from

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/06/16 06:04, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/06/2016 09:25 AM, Peter Chen wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> from

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:45:34AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/06/2016 10:05 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: > Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:45:34AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/06/2016 10:05 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: > Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/06/2016 09:25 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > from my point,it is a dual-role switch > driver too,

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/06/2016 09:25 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > from my point,it is a dual-role switch > driver too,

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/06/2016 10:05 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. > Dual role switch includes at least below things: > - ID

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/06/2016 10:05 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. > Dual role switch includes at least below things: > - ID

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Brown <broo...@kernel.org>; >> linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Roger Quadros >> <rog...@ti.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port >> mux >> >> Hi, >> >> On 06/05/2016 04:33

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

g Kroah-Hartman ; Lee Jones >> ; Heikki Krogerus ; >> Liam Girdwood ; Mark Brown ; >> linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Roger Quadros >> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port >> mux >> >> Hi

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: > >> Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. > >> > > >> > Dual role switch includes at least below things: > >> > - ID or type-C event detection > >> > - port mux >

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 04:46:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: > >> Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. > >> > > >> > Dual role switch includes at least below things: > >> > - ID or type-C event detection > >> > - port mux >

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >>> from my point,it is a dual-role switch > >>> driver too, > >> No, it's not a dual-role switch driver, but a

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 02:55:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >>> from my point,it is a dual-role switch > >>> driver too, > >> No, it's not a dual-role switch driver, but a

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

nel.org; Roger Quadros > <rog...@ti.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > Hi, > > On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: > >> Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. > >

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

d ; Mark Brown ; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Roger Quadros > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > Hi, > > On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: > >> Port mux is part of dual role switch

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: >> Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. >> > >> > Dual role switch includes at least below things: >> > - ID or type-C event detection >> > - port mux >> > - VBUS management >> > - start/stop host/device controllers >> > >>

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi, On 06/05/2016 04:33 PM, Jun Li wrote: >> Port mux is part of dual role switch, but not the whole thing. >> > >> > Dual role switch includes at least below things: >> > - ID or type-C event detection >> > - port mux >> > - VBUS management >> > - start/stop host/device controllers >> > >>

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Roger Quadros > <rog...@ti.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > Hi Peter, > > On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu B

RE: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Lee Jones > ; Heikki Krogerus ; > Liam Girdwood ; Mark Brown ; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Roger Quadros > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port > mux > > Hi Peter, > > On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>> from my point,it is a dual-role switch >>> driver too, >> No, it's not a dual-role switch driver, but a driver for USB port >> multiplexing. >> >> One example of port multiplexing

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/04/2016 10:28 AM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>> from my point,it is a dual-role switch >>> driver too, >> No, it's not a dual-role switch driver, but a driver for USB port >> multiplexing. >> >> One example of port multiplexing

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/03/2016 03:41 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > >> > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 12:06:06AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06/03/2016 03:41 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > >> > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > >> > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/03/2016 03:41 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely >> > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share >> > a single USB port. There is

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Hi Peter, On 06/03/2016 03:41 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely >> > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share >> > a single USB port. There is

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:16:32AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:41:13PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > > > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:16:32AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:41:13PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > > > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:41:13PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share > > a single USB port. There

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:41:13PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share > > a single USB port. There

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share > a single USB port. There is another external port mux which controls > where the data lines

Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:37:24AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely > separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share > a single USB port. There is another external port mux which controls > where the data lines

[PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share a single USB port. There is another external port mux which controls where the data lines should go. While the USB controllers are part of the silicon, the

[PATCH v10 2/7] usb: mux: add generic code for dual role port mux

Several Intel platforms implement USB dual role by having completely separate xHCI and dwc3 IPs in PCH or SOC silicons. These two IPs share a single USB port. There is another external port mux which controls where the data lines should go. While the USB controllers are part of the silicon, the