On 9/5/2013 11:48 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler
>>> wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey
On 9/5/2013 11:48 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
wrote:
> The /proc/*/attr
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
wrote:
> The /proc/*/attr
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
>>> wrote:
The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
done by setting
On 8/6/2013 3:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
>>> done by setting CONFIG_SECURITY_PRESENT. Additional interfaces
>>>
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
>> done by setting CONFIG_SECURITY_PRESENT. Additional interfaces
>> have been created in /proc/*/attr so that each LSM has its own
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
wrote:
> The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
> done by setting CONFIG_SECURITY_PRESENT. Additional interfaces
> have been created in /proc/*/attr so that each LSM has its own
> named interfaces. The name of the
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
done by setting CONFIG_SECURITY_PRESENT. Additional interfaces
have been created in /proc/*/attr so that each LSM has its own
named interfaces. The
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
done by setting CONFIG_SECURITY_PRESENT. Additional interfaces
have been created in /proc/*/attr so that each
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
On 8/5/2013 11:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com
wrote:
The /proc/*/attr interfaces are given to one LSM. This can be
done by setting
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/31/2013 7:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
>>>
>>> Version 14 of this p
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
On 7/31/2013 7:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
Version 14 of this patchset is based
On 7/31/2013 7:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
>>
>> Version 14 of this patchset is based on v3.10.
>> It required significant change from version 13
On 7/31/2013 7:48 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
Version 14 of this patchset is based on v3.10.
It required significant change from version 13 due to changes
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
>
> Version 14 of this patchset is based on v3.10.
> It required significant change from version 13 due to changes
> in the audit code. It came out cleaner, especially
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Casey Schaufler
ca...@schaufler-ca.com wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
Version 14 of this patchset is based on v3.10.
It required significant change from version 13 due to changes
in the audit code. It came out cleaner
Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
Version 14 of this patchset is based on v3.10.
It required significant change from version 13 due to changes
in the audit code. It came out cleaner, especially in the changes
to NetLabel. This version supports all existing LSMs running
Subject: [PATCH v14 0/6] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs
Version 14 of this patchset is based on v3.10.
It required significant change from version 13 due to changes
in the audit code. It came out cleaner, especially in the changes
to NetLabel. This version supports all existing LSMs running
22 matches
Mail list logo