在 2020/7/10 下午7:28, Kirill A. Shutemov 写道:
>> * hugetlb_fault_mutex (hugetlbfs specific page fault mutex)
>> * anon_vma->rwsem
>> * mm->page_table_lock or pte_lock
>> - * pgdat->lru_lock (in mark_page_accessed, isolate_lru_page)
>> *
在 2020/7/9 下午11:48, Kirill A. Shutemov 写道:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:52:34PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:15:09PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
Hi Kirill & Johannes & Matthew,
>>
>> Adding Kirill, who was in patch's Cc
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:52:34PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:15:09PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> > > Hi Kirill & Johannes & Matthew,
>
> Adding Kirill, who was in patch's Cc list but not mail's Cc list.
>
> I asked Alex to
在 2020/7/7 下午12:52, Hugh Dickins 写道:
> My vote, for dispatch of the series, is to leave this patch in;
> but cannot object if consensus were that it should be taken out.
hi Johannes & Kirill,
What's your comments for this patch or others? I am ok to withdraw
this patch if no one like to give
在 2020/7/6 下午7:35, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
>> Would you like to give some comments or share your concern of this patchset,
>> specialy for THP part?
> I don't have the brain space to understand this patch set fully at
> the moment. I'll note that the realtime folks are doing their best to
> stamp
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:15:09PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> > Hi Kirill & Johannes & Matthew,
Adding Kirill, who was in patch's Cc list but not mail's Cc list.
I asked Alex to direct this one particularly to Kirill and Johannes
and Matthew because (and
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:15:09PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> Hi Kirill & Johannes & Matthew,
>
> Would you like to give some comments or share your concern of this patchset,
> specialy for THP part?
I don't have the brain space to understand this patch set fully at
the moment. I'll note that
Hi Kirill & Johannes & Matthew,
Would you like to give some comments or share your concern of this patchset,
specialy for THP part?
Many Thanks
Alex
在 2020/7/3 下午1:07, Alex Shi 写道:
> lru_lock and page cache xa_lock have no reason with current sequence,
> put them together isn't necessary.
lru_lock and page cache xa_lock have no reason with current sequence,
put them together isn't necessary. let's narrow the lru locking, but
left the local_irq_disable to block interrupt re-entry and statistic update.
Hugh Dickins point: split_huge_page_to_list() was already silly,to be
using the
9 matches
Mail list logo
