Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicolas-Pitre/PATCH-v2-posix-timers-make-it-configurable/20160915-045004 config: sparc64-allnoconfig (attac

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread kbuild test robot
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicolas-Pitre/PATCH-v2-posix-timers-make-it-configurable/20160915-045004 config: sparc64-allnoconfig (attac

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:09:53PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > > > 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 05:09:53PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > > > 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > > 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when configured out. > > > > Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > > 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when configured out. > > > > Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when configured out. > > Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to > use those syscalls which

Re: [PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when configured out. > > Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to > use those syscalls which

[PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Nicolas Pitre
Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when configured out. Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to use those syscalls which should be enough of a clue if they were disabled without proper

[PATCH v2) posix-timers: make it configurable

2016-09-14 Thread Nicolas Pitre
Many embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about 22KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when configured out. Corresponding syscalls are routed to a stub logging the attempt to use those syscalls which should be enough of a clue if they were disabled without proper