On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:58 +1100
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kumar Gala writes:
>
> > np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
>
> I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
> 2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Is that a new
Kumar Gala writes:
> np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
David Miller writes:
> I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because
> it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64
> NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more smoothly.
Sounds like we should get Stephen to put it in linux-next-stable once
we're convinced it's all
Kumar Gala writes:
np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
David Miller writes:
I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because
it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64
NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more smoothly.
Sounds like we should get Stephen to put it in linux-next-stable once
we're convinced it's all OK.
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:15:58 +1100
Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kumar Gala writes:
np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I was going to put it into my powerpc-next branch and put it in
2.6.26. I don't see any need for it to go in 2.6.25.
Is that a new branch
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:02:04 -0600
> np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because
it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64
NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more
On Feb 19, 2008, at 6:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:51:37 -0600 (CST)
If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not
coalesce
the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32
for the
memory
From: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:51:37 -0600 (CST)
> If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not coalesce
> the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32 for the
> memory region as its assumed to only have one region.
>
> We
If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not coalesce
the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32 for the
memory region as its assumed to only have one region.
We can fix this easily by causing the initial add to replace the dummy
region.
Signed-off-by:
If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not coalesce
the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32 for the
memory region as its assumed to only have one region.
We can fix this easily by causing the initial add to replace the dummy
region.
Signed-off-by:
From: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:51:37 -0600 (CST)
If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not coalesce
the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32 for the
memory region as its assumed to only have one region.
We can
On Feb 19, 2008, at 6:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:51:37 -0600 (CST)
If we add to an empty lmb region with a non-zero base we will not
coalesce
the number of regions down to one. This causes problems on ppc32
for the
memory
From: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:02:04 -0600
np. Are we trying to get this into 2.6.25 or .26?
I'm ambivalent but I would obviously prefer 2.6.25 because
it would allow me to proceed more easily with my sparc64
NUMA work as well as get your bug fixes in more
14 matches
Mail list logo
