On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>
>> I've been playing with an idea of pulling in some basic MMIO gpio
>> access directly into gpiolib so that when appropriate gpiolib itself
>> can have a fast path for doing the
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> I've been playing with an idea of pulling in some basic MMIO gpio
> access directly into gpiolib so that when appropriate gpiolib itself
> can have a fast path for doing the register access and shadow register
> management.
Shadow
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> While you're working on that, I'd like you to keep the following in
> mind. I'm getting concerned with the level of overhead that the gpio
> access routines are incuring. They're doing a lot of checks right now
> when with GPIOs we want it to
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
While you're working on that, I'd like you to keep the following in
mind. I'm getting concerned with the level of overhead that the gpio
access routines are incuring. They're doing a lot of checks right now
when
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
I've been playing with an idea of pulling in some basic MMIO gpio
access directly into gpiolib so that when appropriate gpiolib itself
can have a fast path for doing the register access and shadow register
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
I've been playing with an idea of pulling in some basic MMIO gpio
access directly into gpiolib so that when appropriate gpiolib itself
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot
>> wrote:
>>> Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
>>> you merged recently, so I'd be
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot
> wrote:
>> Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
>> you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the
>> patch mentioned in the
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
> you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the
> patch mentioned in the description.
They won't get squashed in because the tree is
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the
patch mentioned in the description.
They won't get squashed in because the
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix
Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the
patch mentioned in the description.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> This short series is a fixup to patch 6/9 of
Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that
you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the
patch mentioned in the description.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Alexandre Courbot acour...@nvidia.com wrote:
This short series is a
This short series is a fixup to patch 6/9 of my previous series ("gpiolib: use
descriptors internally"), which mainly addresses issues raised by Linus W. in
this patch and a few other minor ones caught while proof-reading gpiolib.
First patch is the most significant. It mostly avoids oopses when
This short series is a fixup to patch 6/9 of my previous series (gpiolib: use
descriptors internally), which mainly addresses issues raised by Linus W. in
this patch and a few other minor ones caught while proof-reading gpiolib.
First patch is the most significant. It mostly avoids oopses when
16 matches
Mail list logo
