On 03/03/15 16:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose"
This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on
On 03/03/15 16:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com
This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
driver code. The MCPM
On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose"
This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on ARM(32) and contains
arm32 assembly and
On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com
This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on ARM(32) and contains
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose"
This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on ARM(32) and contains
arm32 assembly and hence can't be built on ARM64. This patch splits
From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com
This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64.
The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM
driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on ARM(32) and contains
arm32 assembly and hence can't be built on
6 matches
Mail list logo