Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Move MIPI detach() / unregister() to detach()

2021-03-31 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:53 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze: > > The register() / attach() for MIPI happen in the bridge's > > attach(). That means that the inverse belongs in the bridge's > > detach(). > > > As I commented in previous patch,

Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Move MIPI detach() / unregister() to detach()

2021-03-31 Thread Andrzej Hajda
W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze: > The register() / attach() for MIPI happen in the bridge's > attach(). That means that the inverse belongs in the bridge's > detach(). As I commented in previous patch, it would be better to fix mipi/bridge registration order in host and

[PATCH v2 05/14] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Move MIPI detach() / unregister() to detach()

2021-03-29 Thread Douglas Anderson
The register() / attach() for MIPI happen in the bridge's attach(). That means that the inverse belongs in the bridge's detach(). Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson --- (no changes since v1) drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6