On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:06:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> 2017-03-23 6:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
>
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:06:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> 2017-03-23 6:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> @@ -339,6 +352,7 @@ struct denali_nand_info {
> >> int bbtskipbytes;
> >> int
Hi Boris,
2017-03-23 6:12 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> +static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> +struct
Hi Boris,
2017-03-23 6:12 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> +static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>> +struct denali_nand_info *denali)
>> +{
>> + int bank = denali->flash_bank;
>> +
Hi Boris,
2017-03-23 6:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> @@ -339,6 +352,7 @@ struct denali_nand_info {
>> int bbtskipbytes;
>> int max_banks;
>>
Hi Boris,
2017-03-23 6:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> @@ -339,6 +352,7 @@ struct denali_nand_info {
>> int bbtskipbytes;
>> int max_banks;
>> unsigned int caps;
>> +#define DENALI_CAP_HW_ECC_FIXUP
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> +static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +struct denali_nand_info *denali)
> +{
> + int bank = denali->flash_bank;
> + uint32_t ecc_cor;
> + unsigned
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> +static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +struct denali_nand_info *denali)
> +{
> + int bank = denali->flash_bank;
> + uint32_t ecc_cor;
> + unsigned int max_bitflips;
> +
> +
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> @@ -339,6 +352,7 @@ struct denali_nand_info {
> int bbtskipbytes;
> int max_banks;
> unsigned int caps;
> +#define DENALI_CAP_HW_ECC_FIXUP BIT(0)
Can you move this
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:07:19 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> @@ -339,6 +352,7 @@ struct denali_nand_info {
> int bbtskipbytes;
> int max_banks;
> unsigned int caps;
> +#define DENALI_CAP_HW_ECC_FIXUP BIT(0)
Can you move this definition outside of the struct
Some old versions of the Denali IP (perhaps used only for Intel?)
detects ECC errors and provides correct data via a register, but
does not touch the transferred data. So, the software must fixup
the data in the buffer according to the provided ECC correction
information.
Newer versions perform
Some old versions of the Denali IP (perhaps used only for Intel?)
detects ECC errors and provides correct data via a register, but
does not touch the transferred data. So, the software must fixup
the data in the buffer according to the provided ECC correction
information.
Newer versions perform
Some old versions of the Denali IP (perhaps used only for Intel?)
detects ECC errors and provides correct data via a register, but
does not touch the transferred data. So, the software must fixup
the data in the buffer according to the provided ECC correction
information.
Newer versions perform
Some old versions of the Denali IP (perhaps used only for Intel?)
detects ECC errors and provides correct data via a register, but
does not touch the transferred data. So, the software must fixup
the data in the buffer according to the provided ECC correction
information.
Newer versions perform
14 matches
Mail list logo