On 06/22/2017 06:51 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
> good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
> a few times until
On 06/22/2017 06:51 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
> good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
> a few times until
Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
a few times until now. So, let's initialize only efi struct members
Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
a few times until now. So, let's initialize only efi struct members
4 matches
Mail list logo