On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to
> create an explicit function to reverse the operation.
>
> We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't
>
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to
> create an explicit function to reverse the operation.
>
> We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't
> return anything.
>
> In order to
The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to
create an explicit function to reverse the operation.
We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't
return anything.
In order to be less confusing, and easier to use for downstream users,
change
The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to
create an explicit function to reverse the operation.
We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't
return anything.
In order to be less confusing, and easier to use for downstream users,
change
4 matches
Mail list logo