On 10/07/2014 08:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
This is in preparation for clock providers to not have to deal with struct clk.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-programmable.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-kona.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 9
On 10/07/2014 08:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
This is in preparation for clock providers to not have to deal with struct clk.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.com
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-programmable.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-kona.c | 4 ++--
This is in preparation for clock providers to not have to deal with struct clk.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-programmable.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-kona.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 9 +
drivers/clk/clk.c |
This is in preparation for clock providers to not have to deal with struct clk.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.com
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-programmable.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-kona.c | 4 ++--
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 9 +
4 matches
Mail list logo