On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:26:05PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis R. Rodriguez [27/06/17 00:44 +0200]:
> > Feel free to decouple it, but note that then the commit log must then be
> > changed. My own take is this fix is not so critical as it is a corner case,
> > so
> > I have instead
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:26:05PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis R. Rodriguez [27/06/17 00:44 +0200]:
> > Feel free to decouple it, but note that then the commit log must then be
> > changed. My own take is this fix is not so critical as it is a corner case,
> > so
> > I have instead
+++ Luis R. Rodriguez [27/06/17 00:44 +0200]:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
+++ Luis R. Rodriguez [27/06/17 00:44 +0200]:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > This v3 nukes
+++ Petr Mladek [27/06/17 10:13 +0200]:
On Tue 2017-06-27 02:27:44, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at
+++ Petr Mladek [27/06/17 10:13 +0200]:
On Tue 2017-06-27 02:27:44, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at
On Tue 2017-06-27 02:27:44, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue 2017-06-27 02:27:44, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > > >
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:44:42AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > This v3 nukes the proc sysctl
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:37:36PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor
+++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
just check kernel revision. Prior
+++ Kees Cook [20/06/17 17:23 -0700]:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
>> just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
>> just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
>> try to
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
> just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
> try to avoid hammering more than 50 kmod threads as they can fail and
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
> just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
> try to avoid hammering more than 50 kmod threads as they can fail and
This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
try to avoid hammering more than 50 kmod threads as they can fail and it'd
get -ENOMEM.
We do away with the old heuristics on assuming you
This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
try to avoid hammering more than 50 kmod threads as they can fail and it'd
get -ENOMEM.
We do away with the old heuristics on assuming you
20 matches
Mail list logo