Hi,
On 05/09/16 10:58, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Right now we trap some of the user space data cache operations
> based on a few Errata (ARM 819472, 826319, 827319 and 824069).
> We need to trap userspace access to CTR_EL0, if we detect mismatched
> cache line size. Since both these traps share
Hi,
On 05/09/16 10:58, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Right now we trap some of the user space data cache operations
> based on a few Errata (ARM 819472, 826319, 827319 and 824069).
> We need to trap userspace access to CTR_EL0, if we detect mismatched
> cache line size. Since both these traps share
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:58:28AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Right now we trap some of the user space data cache operations
> based on a few Errata (ARM 819472, 826319, 827319 and 824069).
> We need to trap userspace access to CTR_EL0, if we detect mismatched
> cache line size. Since both
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:58:28AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Right now we trap some of the user space data cache operations
> based on a few Errata (ARM 819472, 826319, 827319 and 824069).
> We need to trap userspace access to CTR_EL0, if we detect mismatched
> cache line size. Since both
Right now we trap some of the user space data cache operations
based on a few Errata (ARM 819472, 826319, 827319 and 824069).
We need to trap userspace access to CTR_EL0, if we detect mismatched
cache line size. Since both these traps share the EC, refactor
the handler a little bit to make it a
Right now we trap some of the user space data cache operations
based on a few Errata (ARM 819472, 826319, 827319 and 824069).
We need to trap userspace access to CTR_EL0, if we detect mismatched
cache line size. Since both these traps share the EC, refactor
the handler a little bit to make it a
6 matches
Mail list logo