Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] drm/i2c: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation

2014-07-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:47:32AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > The I2C address (reg) is required for the TDA998x driver to be loaded > and initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine > --- > - v3 > - change subject to drm/i2c > - v2 > - don't force the I2C address to

Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] drm/i2c: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation

2014-07-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:47:32AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: The I2C address (reg) is required for the TDA998x driver to be loaded and initialized. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine moin...@free.fr --- - v3 - change subject to drm/i2c - v2 - don't force the I2C

[PATCH v3 RESEND] drm/i2c: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation

2014-06-19 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
The I2C address (reg) is required for the TDA998x driver to be loaded and initialized. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine --- - v3 - change subject to drm/i2c - v2 - don't force the I2C address to be 0x70 This patch applies to linux-next. ---

[PATCH v3 RESEND] drm/i2c: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation

2014-06-19 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
The I2C address (reg) is required for the TDA998x driver to be loaded and initialized. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine moin...@free.fr --- - v3 - change subject to drm/i2c - v2 - don't force the I2C address to be 0x70 This patch applies to linux-next. ---