On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:33:47AM -0700, Sonny Rao wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson
>
> Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
>
> * The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
> we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
>
> * The firmware
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:33:47AM -0700, Sonny Rao wrote:
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
*
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:49:42PM +, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 09:33 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
> > From: Doug Anderson
> >
> > Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
> >
> > * The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
> >we don't want to
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:49:42PM +, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/08/2014 09:33 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 08:14 -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Yingjoe,
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Yingjoe Chen
> wrote:
> > Sorry for the (very) late reply.
> > I just realize today MT8135 need this and the other patch [1] to boot
> > SMP correctly. I've applied both patches and
Yingjoe,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> Sorry for the (very) late reply.
> I just realize today MT8135 need this and the other patch [1] to boot
> SMP correctly. I've applied both patches and they works fine. Thanks :)
Excellent. It's helpful to include a Tested-by: tag
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 15:33 +0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson
>
> Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
>
> * The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
> we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
>
> * The firmware isn't
On 11/26/2014 01:55 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:49:57 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:49:57 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> >> On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014,
On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed
On 10/08/2014 09:33 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
From: Doug Anderson
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
* The firmware isn't involved in SMP bringup
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> >> Hi Doug, Olof,
> >>
> >> IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
facilitate the
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> Hi Doug, Olof,
>
> IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
> arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
> facilitate the integration.
>
> Olof, is it this patch you
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
facilitate the integration.
Olof, is it this patch you were worried about ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
On 11/20/2014 12:01 AM, Doug Anderson
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
facilitate the integration.
Olof, is it this patch you were worried about ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
On 11/20/2014 12:01 AM, Doug Anderson
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
facilitate the integration.
Olof, is it this patch you were
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to
facilitate the
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in
arm-soc.
On 10/08/2014 09:33 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
* The firmware isn't
On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
Hi Doug, Olof,
IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:49:57 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel
On 11/26/2014 01:55 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:49:57 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch,
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 15:33 +0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
* The
Yingjoe,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Yingjoe Chen yingjoe.c...@mediatek.com wrote:
Sorry for the (very) late reply.
I just realize today MT8135 need this and the other patch [1] to boot
SMP correctly. I've applied both patches and they works fine. Thanks :)
Excellent. It's helpful to
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 08:14 -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
Yingjoe,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Yingjoe Chen yingjoe.c...@mediatek.com
wrote:
Sorry for the (very) late reply.
I just realize today MT8135 need this and the other patch [1] to boot
SMP correctly. I've applied both
On 11/20/2014 12:01 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Daniel,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
From: Doug Anderson
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of
On 11/20/2014 12:01 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Daniel,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Sonny Rao sonny...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
Daniel,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Sonny Rao wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson
>
> Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
>
> * The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
> we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
>
> * The firmware
Daniel,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Sonny Rao sonny...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of
From: Doug Anderson
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
* The firmware isn't involved in SMP bringup or resume.
* The ARCH timer come up with an
From: Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org
Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
* The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
* The firmware isn't involved in SMP bringup or resume.
* The ARCH
32 matches
Mail list logo
