On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:05:13AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> What changed between versions of this series?
Ah no changes, I thought this was normal convention when doing
a resend, but after looking through other LKML patches
they just use a giant RESEND instead of bumping the version.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:05:13AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> What changed between versions of this series?
Ah no changes, I thought this was normal convention when doing
a resend, but after looking through other LKML patches
they just use a giant RESEND instead of bumping the version.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:48:02PM -1000, Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> The nozomi module has a few sections which could use a bit of cleanup;
> both style and clarity could be improved while maintaining equivalent
> semantics.
>
> Cleanup messy portions of the module code while preserving existing
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:48:02PM -1000, Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> The nozomi module has a few sections which could use a bit of cleanup;
> both style and clarity could be improved while maintaining equivalent
> semantics.
>
> Cleanup messy portions of the module code while preserving existing
>
The nozomi module has a few sections which could use a bit of cleanup;
both style and clarity could be improved while maintaining equivalent
semantics.
Cleanup messy portions of the module code while preserving existing
behavior by:
- Replacing constructs like `len__ > TMP_BUF_MAX ? TMP_BUF_MAX
The nozomi module has a few sections which could use a bit of cleanup;
both style and clarity could be improved while maintaining equivalent
semantics.
Cleanup messy portions of the module code while preserving existing
behavior by:
- Replacing constructs like `len__ > TMP_BUF_MAX ? TMP_BUF_MAX
6 matches
Mail list logo
