On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:58:50PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> 2014-11-24 12:35 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold :
> > You should also fix the commit message, which claims to define a "helper
> > function which is compatible with both properties", something which was
> > no longer the case.
> >
> So I
Am Montag, 24. November 2014, 14:01:02 schrieb Romain Perier:
> 2014-11-24 13:58 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier :
> > So I need to resend this patch which would only introduce an helper
> > function which checks for "system-power-controller" property (it would
> > also have a new commit message).
> > As
2014-11-24 13:58 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier :
> 2014-11-24 12:35 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold :
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:24:56AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
>>> > > From: Romain Perier
>>>
2014-11-24 12:35 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold :
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:24:56AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
>> > > From: Romain Perier
>> > >
>> > > It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:24:56AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
> > > From: Romain Perier
> > >
> > > It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
> > >
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
> > From: Romain Perier
> >
> > It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
> > capability").
> > As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:24:56AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
2014-11-24 12:35 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold jo...@kernel.org:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:24:56AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit
2014-11-24 13:58 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com:
2014-11-24 12:35 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold jo...@kernel.org:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:24:56AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
Am Montag, 24. November 2014, 14:01:02 schrieb Romain Perier:
2014-11-24 13:58 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com:
So I need to resend this patch which would only introduce an helper
function which checks for system-power-controller property (it would
also have a new commit
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:58:50PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
2014-11-24 12:35 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold jo...@kernel.org:
You should also fix the commit message, which claims to define a helper
function which is compatible with both properties, something which was
no longer the case.
So
2014-11-21 14:18 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier :
> it was merged by Lee Jones (so it was merged onto
> the mfd tree)
It was done, for a previous serie, not this one . This is when I
proposed to update the dts too (for all boards using the custom
property) until the discussion turned into a troll.
2014-11-21 11:59 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold :
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
>> From: Romain Perier
>>
>> It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
>> capability").
>> As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
> From: Romain Perier
>
> It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
> capability").
> As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
> old established property name,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established
2014-11-21 11:59 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold jo...@kernel.org:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +, Auto Configured wrote:
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it
2014-11-21 14:18 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com:
it was merged by Lee Jones (so it was merged onto
the mfd tree)
It was done, for a previous serie, not this one . This is when I
proposed to update the dts too (for all boards using the custom
property) until the discussion
ping
2014-11-17 11:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier :
> @Most of the people who were ranting about this serie: could you send
> feedbacks please ?
>
> 2014-11-14 8:22 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Who should merge this serie ? as Mark merged the previous one it would
>> probably make sense to
ping
2014-11-17 11:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com:
@Most of the people who were ranting about this serie: could you send
feedbacks please ?
2014-11-14 8:22 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Who should merge this serie ? as Mark merged the previous
@Most of the people who were ranting about this serie: could you send
feedbacks please ?
2014-11-14 8:22 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier :
> Hi,
>
> Who should merge this serie ? as Mark merged the previous one it would
> probably make sense to do the same here (at least, in my opinion)
>
> Thanks for
@Most of the people who were ranting about this serie: could you send
feedbacks please ?
2014-11-14 8:22 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Who should merge this serie ? as Mark merged the previous one it would
probably make sense to do the same here (at least, in my
Hi,
Who should merge this serie ? as Mark merged the previous one it would
probably make sense to do the same here (at least, in my opinion)
Thanks for your feedbacks.
Have a nice day,
Romain
2014-11-13 21:55 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely :
igned-off-by: Romain Perier
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely
>
>
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:34:58 +
, Auto Configured
wrote:
> From: Romain Perier
>
> It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
> capability").
> As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
> old established property name, without
From: Romain Perier
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability").
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
the word "source" usually tends to
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
the word source
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:34:58 +
, Auto Configured romain.per...@gmail.com
wrote:
From: Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
Hi,
Who should merge this serie ? as Mark merged the previous one it would
probably make sense to do the same here (at least, in my opinion)
Thanks for your feedbacks.
Have a nice day,
Romain
2014-11-13 21:55 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org:
igned-off-by: Romain Perier
28 matches
Mail list logo
